Article 371 of Indian Constitution offers unique provisions for sure states to make sure equitable development. It offers specific administrative, economic, and cultural rights, permitting state-unique governance to deal with nearby desires and preserve country wide unity.
The following table provides the list of articles and associated states as per Article 371.
Name of the State | Respective Article |
Gujarat | Article 371 |
Maharashtra | Article 371 |
Nagaland | Article 371 A |
Assam | Article 371 B |
Manipur | Article 371 C |
Andhra Pradesh / Telangana | Article 371 D |
Andhra Pradesh / Telangana | Article 371 E |
Sikkim | Article 371 F |
Mizoram | Article 371 G |
Arunachal Pradesh | Article 371 H |
Goa | Article 371 I |
Karnataka | Article 371 J |
Article 371 A explicitly provides for provisions related to Maharashtra and Gujarat. The President, under Article 371 of Indian Constitution, enshrines the respective governors with the following special responsibilities:
Article 371 of Indian Constitution relates to Nagaland. It ensures that the cultural and religious practices of the Nagas are safeguarded. It provides for the following provisions:
Article 371B provides for special provisions for Assam. Under this article, the safeguards related to the tribals in the State are ensured.
Article 371C provides special provisions for the State of Manipur. Under this article, the safeguards related to the hill areas of the State are ensured.
Sikkim became a full-fledged member of the Indian Union in 1975. The 36th Amendment Act introduced this article in the Constitution of India. Article 371 F relates to the safeguards of Sikkim and its people.
Article 371 D and Article 371 E relate to the states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. It seeks to provide special provisions regarding the State. It aims to ensure equity and the holistic development of the population.
This clause deals with the special provisions for the State of Mizoram. It was not in the original text of the Article 371 of Indian Constitution. It was added by the 53rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1986.
Article 371 H relates to Arunachal Pradesh. This provision was added by the 55th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1986.
Article 371 I provides safeguards related to the representation of people in the legislative assembly. It provides that the Legislative Assembly of the State of Goa shall have at least 30 members.
This clause was inserted by the 98th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2012. The clause relates to the Hyderabad Karnataka region of the State of Karnataka. The hyderabad-Karnataka region includes six backward districts of Northern Karnataka: Gulbarga, Bidar, Raichur, Koppal, Yadgir, and Bellary. The President can give the Governor of Karnataka the power to:
S.No. | Purpose | Details |
---|---|---|
1 | Regional Development | Ensures equitable economic and social development in specific regions of India. |
2 | Administrative Efficiency | Provides flexibility in governance tailored to the unique needs of certain states. |
3 | Protection of Local Interests | Safeguards the rights of indigenous and local communities in terms of land and employment. |
4 | Special Governance Powers | Allocates discretionary powers to Governors for effective state administration. |
5 | Cultural and Linguistic Preservation | Protects regional cultures, languages, and traditions to maintain India’s diversity. |
6 | Educational Advancement | Promotes educational facilities and opportunities for underdeveloped regions and communities. |
7 | Economic Benefits | Allocates special financial assistance for state-specific developmental programs. |
8 | Legislative Autonomy | Allows certain states to enact laws addressing their unique socio-economic challenges. |
9 | Preventing Regional Disparities | Reduces inequalities between economically advanced and backward regions. |
10 | Strengthening National Integration | Encourages inclusive development to maintain harmony and strengthen the federal structure. |
S.No. | Aspect of Criticism | Details |
---|---|---|
1 | Regional Inequality | Critics argue it creates unequal governance by providing special privileges to some states. |
2 | Erosion of Uniformity | Opponents believe it undermines the principle of uniformity in the application of laws. |
3 | Political Misuse | Concerns exist about the misuse of special provisions for political gains by local governments. |
4 | Complex Administration | The distinct provisions make governance and coordination with the central government complex. |
5 | Favoritism Allegations | Other states often perceive it as favoritism towards a few regions. |
6 | Development Disparity | Critics claim the provisions have not sufficiently addressed development disparities. |
7 | Governor’s Discretion | Excessive discretionary powers to Governors can lead to controversies and governance issues. |
8 | Limited Scope | The provisions are often seen as insufficient in addressing the root causes of regional issues. |
9 | Resentment Among Other States | States without special provisions express dissatisfaction, potentially affecting federal unity. |
10 | Hindrance to National Integration | Some argue that granting unique privileges could lead to fragmentation rather than integration. |
Ans: Article 371 of Indian Constitution provides special provisions for specific states to address their unique needs.
Ans: To promote equitable development, protect local interests, and preserve regional cultures.
Ans: States like Maharashtra, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and northeastern states have specific provisions under Article 371.
Ans: No, it has state-specific provisions tailored to the needs of different regions.
Ans: The Governor has special powers to ensure effective implementation of the provisions.
Copyright © CareerGuide.com
Build Version:- 1.0.0.0