The 105th Amendment of Indian Constitution, exceeded in 2021, offers constitutional repute to the Central Educational Institutions (CEIs) Reservation Act, making sure reservations for economically weaker sections (EWS) in admissions to valuable universities and faculties.
Aspect | Importance |
---|---|
Economic Inclusivity | The amendment ensures that economically weaker sections (EWS) of society, not covered by caste-based reservations, get access to educational opportunities. |
Strengthening Reservation System | It expands the reservation framework by introducing an economic criterion, thus providing a broader basis for affirmative action beyond caste. |
Constitutional Backing for EWS | The amendment provides constitutional validity to the 10% reservation for EWS in central educational institutions, ensuring its long-term sustainability. |
No Impact on Existing Quotas | The EWS reservation is introduced without disturbing or reducing the existing reservations for SC, ST, and OBC categories, preserving the existing affirmative action framework. |
Legal Protection | By amending the Constitution, the EWS reservation policy is protected from legal challenges, ensuring its legitimacy and robustness in courts. |
Access to Higher Education | The amendment guarantees that economically disadvantaged individuals will have increased access to higher education, which can improve their socio-economic status. |
Promoting Social Justice | It furthers the objective of social justice by addressing economic inequalities, providing marginalized individuals with better opportunities for education and employment. |
Enhancing Educational Opportunities | The reservation in central universities and colleges ensures that the marginalized groups benefit from quality education, which might otherwise be inaccessible due to financial constraints. |
Fulfilling Constitutional Mandates | The amendment aligns with the Constitution’s goal of creating a more inclusive society, providing a fair opportunity to those who are economically disadvantaged. |
Encouraging Economic Empowerment | By offering educational opportunities to economically weaker individuals, the amendment fosters economic empowerment and helps break the cycle of poverty through education. |
Judicial Interpretation | Details |
---|---|
Constitutionality of EWS Quota | The Supreme Court of India upheld the 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) under the 105th Amendment, affirming its constitutional validity in educational institutions. The court clarified that the EWS reservation was based on economic criteria and did not violate the basic structure of the Constitution. |
EWS Reservation Not to Overlap with OBC Quota | The Supreme Court made it clear that the EWS reservation was distinct and separate from the OBC quota, ensuring that there would be no overlap. The court emphasized that EWS benefits are based on economic status, not caste. |
Limits of Reservation | The court observed that the overall reservation limit, including EWS and other categories, should not exceed the 50% ceiling. It held that the amendment did not alter this constitutional limitation, maintaining the balance of reservations in India. |
EWS and Non-Backward Classes | In its interpretation, the judiciary stressed that the EWS reservation was for individuals who are economically disadvantaged, but not part of any existing reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC), reinforcing that the amendment did not disrupt the existing affirmative action framework. |
Affirmative Action for Economic Backwardness | The courts highlighted that the 105th Amendment aims to address economic backwardness, thus promoting social justice for those facing financial hardship, even if they do not belong to a particular caste or tribe. |
Judicial Scrutiny of Policy Changes | Judicial scrutiny ensures that the implementation of the EWS policy adheres to constitutional principles, including the right to equality. The courts continue to examine whether the policy meets the broader objectives of fairness and justice. |
Interpretation of “Economically Weaker Sections” | The Supreme Court has not specified a precise definition of EWS but has left it to the government to decide the criteria based on income and assets. Courts will assess the reasonableness of the criteria in future cases. |
Exclusion from Reservation for EWS | The court affirmed that the EWS reservation should be provided to individuals not covered under any existing reservation categories (SC, ST, OBC), ensuring that those who are economically disadvantaged but belong to the general category also benefit. |
Impact on Judicial Review of Reservations | The judiciary clarified that while economic criteria could be used to grant reservations, any future amendments to reservation laws must comply with the basic structure doctrine, ensuring that it does not violate the fundamental principles of the Constitution. |
Future Challenges and Legal Validity | The courts indicated that future legal challenges might arise on the validity of the EWS criteria or its implementation, suggesting that they would continue to evaluate the amendment in light of evolving social and economic realities. |
Criticism | Details |
---|---|
Exclusion of OBCs from EWS Reservation | Critics argue that the EWS reservation does not include OBCs, who, despite being economically disadvantaged, may not qualify under the EWS criteria. This exclusion may perpetuate the socio-economic disparity within backward classes. |
Economic Criteria Over Caste-Based Reservation | Some argue that the economic criteria for reservation might dilute the effectiveness of caste-based reservations, which were originally designed to address social discrimination, not just economic backwardness. |
No Clear Definition of EWS | The amendment leaves the definition of EWS unclear, leading to inconsistencies in implementation. Critics contend that the lack of a concrete, uniform definition allows for arbitrary decisions on who qualifies as EWS. |
Limited Scope of Economic Justice | The EWS reservation may only benefit the upper sections of the economically backward groups, leaving the most impoverished individuals ineligible. This may fail to address the deeper issues of economic inequality. |
Potential for Overlap with General Category | There is concern that the EWS reservation may overlap with the general category, thereby reducing opportunities for those truly belonging to the general pool of candidates, especially in highly competitive exams. |
Social Justice Concerns | Many believe that the amendment undermines the goal of social justice, as it prioritizes economic criteria over social and educational backwardness, potentially neglecting those who face entrenched caste-based discrimination. |
No Increase in Total Reservation Limit | Although the amendment introduces a 10% EWS reservation, critics argue that no increase in the overall reservation limit (50%) means that the EWS quota may result in a reduction of available seats for other categories. |
Weakening of Affirmative Action | Some believe that the introduction of the EWS quota represents a shift towards a merit-based system, undermining long-standing affirmative action policies designed to address caste-based inequalities. |
Lack of Empirical Data | Critics argue that the government has not provided enough empirical data or studies that prove the effectiveness of EWS reservations, raising doubts about the policy’s impact on actual social and educational upliftment. |
Disadvantage to Poor from Reserved Categories | Individuals from OBC, SC, and ST categories who are economically disadvantaged but not eligible for EWS reservations may find themselves further marginalized, as they cannot avail themselves of the benefits of either system. |
Ans: The 105th Amendment of the Indian Constitution, passed in 2021, provides for a 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in educational institutions and government jobs, based on economic criteria.
Ans: The amendment addresses the need for reservation based on economic criteria for the EWS category, which was previously not recognized under the reservation system, alongside existing provisions for SC, ST, and OBC reservations.
Ans: No, the amendment does not disturb the existing reservations for SC, ST, and OBC. The EWS reservation is additional and operates separately from the caste-based reservations.
Ans: Individuals from the general category who are economically disadvantaged, with an annual income below a certain threshold (currently ₹8 lakh), and not falling under any other reserved category, qualify for EWS reservations.
Ans: The EWS category is granted 10% reservation in educational institutions and government jobs under the 105th Amendment, ensuring opportunities for economically weaker sections.
Copyright © CareerGuide.com
Build Version:- 1.0.0.0